Banks found to be charging fees to deceased estates

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 1 year ago

Banks found to be charging fees to deceased estates

By Millie Muroi

Six Australian banks, including the big four, have been found wanting when it comes to handling deceased estates, with an inquiry finding they continued to charge customers’ accounts even after being notified of their deaths.

In a report released on Friday, the Banking Code Compliance Committee (BCCC) said its review had found all six banks in its inquiry had charged fees for services no longer provided on deceased estates.

The compliance committee monitors banks to ensure they are following the Banking Code of Practice. The independent body’s chair, Ian Govey, said there were also other issues, including banks failing to act within the obligatory 14 days of receiving the necessary information, a lack of respect and compassion towards representatives and family of deceased customers.

Some major banks have recently cut mortgage cashbacks and raised interest rates for new customers.

Some major banks have recently cut mortgage cashbacks and raised interest rates for new customers.Credit: Karl Hilzinger

“While there were instances of good practice, and the issues varied across the banks, we found inadequate systems, processes and procedures were making a difficult time worse for the bereaved,” he said.

After the inquiry, the Banking Code Compliance Committee notified three banks that it would start investigations into their compliance with deceased estates obligations under the code of practice. It also said banks not subject to its inquiry were expected to audit their practices regarding deceased estates.

Loading

“We expect banks to understand their obligations and to ensure their management of deceased estates is fully compliant within 18 months,” Govey said.

The compliance committee chief Prue Monument said while some banks had progressed more than others following the royal commission four years ago, “clearly not enough has been done”.

“Several years ago now, the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry showed that banks had a lot of work to do,” Monument said. “It is reasonable for the community to have expected more progress and seen improvements sooner.”

Advertisement

In March, six of Australia’s financial giants had paid or offered $4.7 billion to compensate customers who suffered loss or detriments after being charged fees for no service or receiving non-compliant advice.

The Banking Code Compliance Committee report said some banks noted the incidents found by the committee were exceptions that did not reflect the broader effectiveness and success of their current systems and processes.

“While they recognised the poor practices and non-compliance with the code that the inquiry identified, they viewed many of these instances as aberrations rather than the norm,” the report read.

Chief executive of the Australian Banking Association (ABA), Anna Bligh, said the country’s banks had made significant improvements in the way they assist families when handling deceased estates.

“It is disappointing that this report does not accurately reflect these efforts,” she said.

The ABA said there were several shortcomings with the report.

Anna Bligh, CEO of the Australian Banking Association, says the BCCC’s report has several shortcomings.

Anna Bligh, CEO of the Australian Banking Association, says the BCCC’s report has several shortcomings.Credit: Peter Rae

“Disappointingly, the report does not note the steady decline in breaches relating to deceased estates during 2021 and 2022, a result of many improvements made by banks,” Bligh said.

“The report covers data and information about processes and practices that are nearly four years old. During this time, many banks have made numerous improvements to their practices and processes concerning deceased estates, including some noted in the report, such as clearer training materials for staff that set out specific fees to refund, and assurance checks through the deceased estate process.”

Bligh also said the report conflated the incorrect charging of personal advice fees – a focus of the Royal Commission – with legitimate fees for account keeping and administration for the ongoing needs of the deceased’s estate, which are permitted under the Banking Code of Practice.

“The conflation of these points is misleading and confusing for readers,” she said.

The ABA will continue to encourage member banks to consider and build upon the report’s findings regardless of shortcomings in the report, Bligh said, as part of continuous improvements to industry practice.

The committee made nine recommendations including better training for staff to communicate with sensitivity, respect and compassion when dealing with representatives of dead customers and having a documented end-to-end quality assurance and control system for the process of managing deceased estates.

Monument said fixing the issues identified in the report would be beneficial not only for customers, but also banks. “Failing to stop fees creates additional work and can contribute to a loss of customer goodwill and harm a bank’s reputation,” she said.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Most Viewed in Business

Loading